© 2013-2017 「愛 真理 生命」 版權所有

Saturday, November 30, 2013

1130 Ketagalan Blvd (1130全民上凱道 反同性婚姻 反修民法972 )

1130 Ketagalan Blvd 

Today (November 30, 2013) thousands and thousands of people gathered on Ketagalan Blvd; those people represent the silent majority of Taiwan society. What Rev. Dr. Immanuel Chih-Ming Ke defends are heterosexual marriage, family, and the well-being of next generation of the silent majority. 

(Our blog has the permission from Coalition for the Happiness of our Next Generation to utilize the photo)

Monday, November 25, 2013

臺灣大學法律學院民事法學中心「新型態家庭結構之法制發展座談會」發言稿/柯志明教授

男女兩性婚姻及其形成之家庭的普世價值
駁以「婚姻平權」為理由將民法親屬篇婚姻章節條款去男女兩性化之修法提案

柯志明
靜宜大學生態人文學系副教授、臺灣大學哲學系兼任副教授
20131122 臺灣大學法律學系霖澤館視聽教室


*本文已收入於《無所謂「同性婚姻」:婚姻的本性與價值》橄欖華宣出版,2016,以及
已刊登於《月旦法學》,227期,元熙出版公司,2014.4 ,頁284-291。


       立法院已一讀通過由民進黨立法委員尤美女、鄭麗君等提案修訂我國民法親屬篇,將婚姻配偶去男女兩性化,宣稱如此做是為了實踐「婚姻平權」,使同性戀者與異性戀一樣得以合法結婚。若修法成功,我國將合法化所謂的「同性婚姻」,同性結合(same sex union)將被國家法律所認同。這絶不只是親屬法律的修訂,更是基本倫常秩序的根本變更,也是有關性、婚姻、家庭之普世倫理意義及關係的變革。
    當臺灣正明顯快速地步上歐美將性、愛情、婚姻、生育、家庭之整體性與連續性割裂開來之風潮的後塵時,我們一定要問:如此修訂民法親屬篇是否合理?修訂後我們的社會將更好還是更壞?為此,在決定是否支持修法前,我們應該仔細詢問並思想:何謂婚姻?何謂婚姻平權?同性別者可否結婚?同性婚姻是否為基本人權?將婚姻去男女兩性化會帶來什麼社會後果?本發言稿將簡要地回答這些問題。. . . . . . (繼續閱讀


 © Love Truth LIfe. All Rights Reserved
  © 愛  真理  生命 版權所有

The Gospel Herald 基督日報: 台灣基督徒學者反同性戀主義言論遭扭曲

田偉 / 基督日報記者
201311251059 (PST)
台大哲學系副教授柯志明近日在媒體
反對同性戀主義者鼓吹的
「同性戀自然論」。(圖:視頻截屏) 
知名基督徒學者、台大哲學系副教授柯志明近日在媒體反對同性戀主義者鼓吹的「同性戀自然論」而遭斷章取義並引發抗議。有關部門呼籲包容多元言論並促雙方溝通以化解誤會。

靜宜大學生態人文學系教授、台灣大學兼任教授柯志明在接受媒體採訪時批評「同性戀與異性戀都是自然的」論調。不過一些別有用心人士對柯教授的言論進行扭曲或斷章取義,導致一些不明真相的學生不滿。

Friday, November 15, 2013

Statement on the “Meeting on the Legalization of Same-Sex Partners” at the ROC Ministry of Justice/ Dr. Immanuel Chih-Ming Ke

Statement on the “Meeting on the Legalization of Same-Sex Partners” at the ROC Ministry of Justice



Immanuel Chih-Ming Ke
Associate Professor, Department of Ecological Humanities, Providence University in Taiwan. 
Adjunct Associate Professor of Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University. 
Oct. 14th, 2013. Civil Service Development Institute. Room 203.
Translation © Sola Scriptura 2013



     1. The “Meeting Objective” for the “Proposal of ‘Meeting on the Legalization of Same-Sex Partners’ at the ROC Ministry of Justice,” which is attached to the “Meeting notification letter of Ministry of Justice” (September 30th, 2013. No. 10203510820) clearly states: “According to the 78th point of ‘Concluding Observations and Recommendations of the Review of the ROC’s Initial Reports on The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR),’ The Experts are concerned at the lack of legal recognition of the diversity of families in the country and that only heterosexual marriages are recognized but not same sex marriages or cohabiting partnerships. This is discriminatory and denies many benefits to couples of same sex or cohabiting partners.” Thus, the responses to the Concluding Observations and Recommendations of two Covenants become the objective of this meeting.
    The more complete opinions of mine, on the legalization of same-sex marriage or same-sex partners, are presented in the statements of “Advisory Meeting of Experts on the Legalization of Same-Sex Partners” on April 14th, 2012, which was held by Professor Yu-Zu Tai of Taipei University, and “Focus Meeting of the Research on the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in Taiwan” on August 15th, 2013, which was held by Professor Shyue-ren Teng of Central Police University. Please consult these statements. The following section is my personal opinion on the Concluding Observations and Recommendations of two Convents, and a brief statement on whether same-sex marriage should become the ethical relationship and marriage system that are positively entitled to protection by the State.

新型態家庭結構之法制發展座談會/ 臺灣大學法律學院民事法學中心


Thursday, November 14, 2013

台灣醒報:我要捍衛柯志明老師的言論自由

我要捍衛柯志明老師的言論自由
余杰(中國異議作家)


我來自一個沒有言論自由的國家,因為捍衛言論自由,付出了被中共特務拘押、軟禁、綁架、酷刑乃至險些喪失生命的代價,最後不得不流亡美國,在言論自由有保障的美國,終於得以自由地寫作和思想。


因著自己的切膚之痛,我對言論自由的議題相當敏感,對任何傷害言論自由的做法和企圖都深懷警惕。當我看到靜宜大學的某個學生社團,因柯志明老師在媒體上發表反對同性戀婚姻合法化的言論,而向校方發起措辭強硬的聯署信,深感不安。


在我看來,柯志明老師所説的「不自然」,只是他對同性戀及某些身體殘障的客觀描述,那是對一種事實和狀態的陳述,而非歧視性的言論。柯志明在哲學和神學研究的同時,長期關注社會公義,關心弱勢群體,絕非僵化傲慢的「知識貴族」。不過,如果有關人士確實覺得被柯志明的言論所冒犯,不同意他的表述,當然可以提出異議,或者與之共通和討論,或者投書媒體直接批評。

Saturday, November 9, 2013

The Liberty Times 自由時報 - 同志不自然說法 正反意見爆舌戰


〔記者陳怡靜、歐素美/綜合報導〕多元成家草案引發熱議,公視「有話好說」節目日前討論同性婚姻可行性,靜宜大學副教授柯志明指兔唇、同性戀、天生缺手者皆為「不自然」,引發外界批評言論歧視,有靜宜學生社團憤怒發起網路連署,要求柯志明道歉,並向校內性平會提出抗議與申訴。

Wednesday, November 6, 2013

20131105有話好說:同志婚姻立院審查!台灣將成亞洲第一?

來賓:
台灣宗教團體愛護家庭大聯盟護家盟發言人 陳志宏
靜宜大學生態人文學系教授 柯志明
作 家 王倩倩
性別人權協會秘書長 王蘋
同志婚姻伴侶 黃美瑜
同志婚姻伴侶 游雅婷



http://talk.news.pts.org.tw/2013/11/blog-post.html#more
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LidGc5W2CbY#t=46